2014. 02. 01.
11 principles
2014. 02. 01.
10 PAKS2 HAS ALTERNATIVES. THIS INVESTMENT TAKES RESOURCES AWAY FROM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY INVESTMENTS.
2014. 02. 01.
9 INCREMENTAL INVESTMENTS, LIKE THE EXPANSION OF THE ELECTRIC GRID, WILL COST FURTHER THOUSAND OF BILLIONS OF FORINTS.
2014. 02. 01.
8 PAKS2 WILL NOT REDUCE ENERGY COSTS, IT WILL NOT INCREASE THE COUNTRY'S COMPETITIVENESS.
2014. 02. 01.
7 THE DECISION DOES NOT HAVE A PROFESSIONAL BASIS. ALTERNATIVES WERE NOT EVEN INVESTIGATED.
2014. 02. 01.
6 WE, OUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN WILL ALL PAY THE COSTS AND THE INTERESTS OF THE NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
2014. 02. 01.
5 THE PUBLIC WAS COMPLETELY EXCLUDED FROM THE DECISION.
2014. 02. 01.
4 THE MOSCOW DEAL DOES NOT SERVE THE INTEREST OF HUNGARIANS. IT MERELY SERVES THE POWER INTERESTS OF A SMALL EXCLUSIVE GROUP.
2014. 02. 01.
3 THE TWO NEW REACTORS FURTHER INCREASE HUNGARY'S UNILATERAL ENERGY DEPENDENCY ON RUSSIA.
2014. 02. 01.
2 THIS IRRESPONSIBLE PACT INDEBTS THE HUNGARIAN PEOPLE ON PAR WITH FOREIGN CURRENCY LOANS.
Pages
Aarhus Convention
appeal
Brussels
competition
conference
contract
Danube
EIA
Energy Plan
Environmental Impact Assessment
environmental licensing
EU
European Commission
Európai Bizottság
hearing
investment
kiégett fűtőelem
Mayak
model
MVM
nemzeti program
Paks II
radioactive waste
radioaktív hulladék
renewables
risks
safety
spent nuclear fuel
state aid
status report
